Legal Opinion
State v. Greyeagle
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 19, 1995No. C9-95-1295PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant was stopped by police solely because the car she was driving bore WX license plates, indicating that the plates were specially issued by the Commissioner of Public Safety pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 168.041 (1994). Appellant, arrested for driving without a license and driving a vehicle with revoked license plates, moved to dismiss the charges on grounds that the trooper’s decision to stop her was not based on a specific, articulable suspicion of criminal activity. Appealing from her subsequent conviction, appellant challenges denial of this motion.
FACTS
State…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. KvamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HenningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. FiebkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. BaumannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. ColosimoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.