State v. Colosimo
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction of refusal to allow inspection of a boat, arguing that he was unlawfully stopped by a conservation officer; that the officer did not have probable cause to inspect the boat; and that the officer’s request to inspect the boat was an unlawful seizure. We reverse.
FACTS
Pro se appellant John Mark Colosimo, an attorney, and four others were in Colo-simo’s boat as it was being towed to a boat landing by a truck driven by Sean Oveson. When Oveson stopped at the landing, Conservation Officer Lloyd Steen, who was standing nearby, approached the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Saundra PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Sitz v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atwood v. VilsackSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- State v. ColosimoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. ColosimoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003