Legal Opinion

State v. Colosimo

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 23, 2002No. C7-01-2181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction of refusal to allow inspection of a boat, arguing that he was unlawfully stopped by a conservation officer; that the officer did not have probable cause to inspect the boat; and that the officer’s request to inspect the boat was an unlawful seizure. We reverse.

FACTS

Pro se appellant John Mark Colosimo, an attorney, and four others were in Colo-simo’s boat as it was being towed to a boat landing by a truck driven by Sean Oveson. When Oveson stopped at the landing, Conservation Officer Lloyd Steen, who was standing nearby, approached the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Saundra PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Sitz v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atwood v. VilsackSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. State v. ColosimoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. State v. ColosimoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API