Legal Opinion
State v. Henning
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 2003No. C9-01-1985PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
This case involves a challenge to an investigative stop made pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 168.0422 (2002); Appellant Joel Robert. Henning was charged in Olmsted County with driving after revocation, Minn.Stat. § 171.24, subd. 2 (2002), no driver’s license in possession, Minn.Stat. § 171.08 (2002), and no current proof of insurance, Minn.Stat. § 169.791(2) (2002).1 Appellant moved to dismiss the charges for the following reasons: 1) there was no reasonable articulable suspicion to justify the stop of the vehicle, and 2) Minn.Stat. § 168.0422 is unconstitutional. An omnibus…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Ascher v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. BurbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. FlowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Rita Ann Stevens v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.