Legal Opinion
DeBeradinis v. Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 4, 1994No. 14777PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
In this administrative appeal, a landowner contests the validity of a trial court judgment *189setting aside the approval of his coastal site plan with conditions because of the statutory invalidity of one of the conditions of the approval. The plaintiff, Louis DeBeradinis, filed with the defendant zoning commission of the town of Norwalk (commission) an application for coastal site plan review1 to allow the expansion of an existing recycling operation onto an adjoining parcel of real estate located within the Connecticut coastal area and Norwalk coastal boundary as delineated by General Statutes…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. CarothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- A.P. & W. Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Binette v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Stamford Hospital v. VegaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Packer v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Adriani v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.