Legal Opinion
Ralston Purina Co. v. Board of Tax Review of Franklin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1987No. 12782; 12783PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this combined appeal is whether a municipality is required under General Statutes § 12-621 to adjust property tax assessments during interim years between decennial revaluations of real property to account for fluctuations in property values resulting solely from changes in market conditions. The plaintiffs in the first case, Ralston Purina Company (Ralston Purina) and Franklin Mushroom Farms, Inc. (Franklin Mushroom), and the plaintiff in *427the second case, Swiss-American Spawn, Inc. (Swiss-American), appealed separately to the Superior Court pursuant to General…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- State v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Coombs v. DarlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. HodgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.