Legal Opinion
Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Ladd
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 14, 1964No. Civ. A. 1688-62PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, District Judge.
This civil action was brought pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145 to obtain judgment authorizing the defendant, Commissioner of Patents, to issue a patent containing claims 1 to 3 of an application Serial No. 704,770 filed December 23, 1957, by the co-plaintiff, Robert Regis. The invention relates to microwave switches.
The tribunals of the Patent Office rejected the claims as unpatentable over the Wallace et al patent No. 2,822,526, in view of the Carlson patent No. 2,491,-644. Counsel for plaintiffs concedes that if Wallace et al is available as “prior art” under 35 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Detrola Radio & Television Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In re GreggCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Dyer v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. BrennerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dix-Seal Corporation v. New Haven Trap Rock CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
- Eli Lilly and Company v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- S. W. Farree, Inc. v. Texas Instruments Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.