Legal Opinion
Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. Rude
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 17, 1953No. 11681PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment holding that the Rude patent 1 2*****for a so-called spider wheel for harrows was valid and infringed. No appeal was taken from the finding and judgment of infringement. We are, therefore, concerned in this case only with the question of validity.
The patent has to do solely with the spider wheel construction and not the manner in which the wheel is carried by various agricultural machines. The wheel itself consists of a flat disc having a hub, and angle steel pointed teeth riveted alternately to opposite sides of the disc, with the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Busell Trimmer Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Tee-Pak, Inc. v. St. Regis Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Schnading Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Amphenol Corporation, a Corporation of Delaware v. General Time Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- The Maytag Company, a Corporation v. The Murray Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.