Legal Opinion
Peer Bearing Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 27, 1998No. Slip Op. 98-70. Court No. 97-01-00023PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
Plaintiffs Peer Bearing Company (“Peer”) and the Timken Company (“Timken”) have filed separate motions for judgment on the agency record pursuant to Rule 56.2 of this Court contesting various aspects of the final results of administrative reviews issued by Commerce regarding tapered roller bearings (“TRBs”) imported from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”).
Background
This case deals with shipments of TRBs and parts thereof, finished and unfinished, from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). On August 25,1995, the Department of Commerce, International Trade…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ferro Union, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Guangdong Chemicals Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Peer Bearing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.