Legal Opinion
Guangdong Chemicals Import & Export Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 18, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-142; Court 05-00023PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Chief Judge.
Restani, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Guang-dong Chemicals Import and Export Corporation (“Guangdong”) challenged the results of an administrative review of an antidumping duty order on sebacic acid from the People’s Republic of China (“China”). Following oral argument, the court remanded for the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) to reconsider the reliability of data used to calculate the surrogate value of sebacic acid, and also to explain its choice to deduct a by-product credit from normal value, rather than from manufacturing costs. On remand, Commerce reexamined…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nation Ford Chemical Company v. United States, and Yude Chemical Company, Zhenxing Chemical Industry Company and Pht International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Xinjiamei Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- DuPont Teijin Films China Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Taian Ziyang Food Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.