Legal Opinion
Timken Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 9, 2001No. SLIP OP. 01-96; 97-12-02156PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff, The Timken Company (“Timken”), moves pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of this Court for judgment on the agency record challenging the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) final determination, entitled Final Results of Antidump-ing Administrative Review of Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of-China, 62 Fed.Reg. 61,276 (Nov. 17,1997).
Timken claims that Commerce erred in: (1) selecting Indonesian, rather than Indian, import statistics for valuing the steel…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Luoyang Bearing Factory v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Hangzhou Spring Washer Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Tianjin MacHinery Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.