Legal Opinion
Peer Bearing Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 25, 2001No. Consol. 97-03-00419PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
This consolidated action concerns the claims raised by Peer Bearing Company (“Peer Bearing”), a plaintiff, and The Timken Company (“Timken”), a plaintiff and a defendant-intervenor. Peer Bearing and Timken move pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of this Court for judgment on the agency record challenging the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) final determination, entitled Final Results of Anti-dumping Duty Administrative Review and Revocation in Part of Antidumping Duty Order on Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof,…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Luoyang Bearing Factory v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Guangdong Wireking Housewares & Hardware Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.