Legal Opinion
Pacific Atlantic Wine, Inc. v. Duccini
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1952No. Civ. 15024PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of nonsuit and from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The appeal from the order must be dismissed, for the order is nonappealable.
The appeal from the judgment involves, primarily, the sufficiency of the evidence tending to prove plaintiff’s case, disregarding all evidence in conflict therewith.
In April, 1935, plaintiff as first party and defendants Gaetano Duccini and Primo E. Caredio as second' parties executed a written contract concerning a certain “apparatus for the production of Vitreous and/or Metallic Surfaces,” a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Wood v. GuntherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hall v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Miller v. Republic Grocery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peacock Hill Ass'n v. Peacock Lagoon Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Traub Co. v. Coffee Break Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Foster v. KeatingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Diverco Constructors, Inc. v. WilsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.