Miller v. Republic Grocery, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside nonsuit and to reopen cause and for consent to file amendment to pleadings.
The factual situation as disclosed by the record is as follows:
Plaintiff commenced an action against defendant upon a promissory note executed by defendant to one Catalina S. Cruz for the sum of $5,400. Tlie complaint alleged the corporate existence of defendant, the execution of the note, which was set out in full, and further that nothing had been paid on the note. There was no allegation that the note had been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Estate of DupontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Nicoll v. WeldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Clavey v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hale v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Lewis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. St. AndrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- State v. SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.