Legal Opinion

Foster v. Keating

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1953No. Civ. 15398PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

The defendant, A. G. Keating, has appealed from a judgment which awards the plaintiff, Harry E. Foster, $31,440 as compensatory or general damages and $9,500 as exemplary damages.

The judgment is based upon findings of fact which may be summarized as follows:

I. Commencing November, 1949, plaintiff owned a lumber yard and planing mill at Fulton, owned and conducted a sawmill business as sublessee of a sawmill near Cazadero, California, and had a timber contract relative to timber on the sawmill property. By the middle of April, 1950, he had invested more than $8,000 in the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. California Gasoline Retailers v. Regal Petroleum Corp. of Fresno, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API