Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Bunn & Peterson and Robert M. Peterson for Real Party in Interest.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
Petitioners 1 seek writs of certiorari and mandate to compel the Los Angeles Superior Court to grant their motions to quash service of summons and to vacate a default judgment and levy of execution against defendants, a corporation, and a partnership in which the corporation was general partner. Defendant corporation’s applicátion to the Commissioner of Corporations for a permit to issue stock stated that Albert Binney, Sr., was its secretary-treasurer; plaintiff, relying on the corporation’s application, attempted to serve defendants by delivery of summons to him.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Hall v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Bein v. Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Gibble v. Car-Lene Research, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Evartt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.