Jordan v. Grover
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Shasta County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
This is an action on a promissory note for two thousand dollars made by the defendant Grover to his co-defendant, Edward H. Flemming, or order, and by the latter indorsed and delivered to the plaintiffs before maturity. The *195answer denies “ that there was any consideration for 'the note,” and avers fraud in the procurement thereof by the payee from the maker, and notice by plaintiffs prior to the purchase. The action was dismissed by plaintiffs as to the defendant Flemming, and upon a trial of the case by a jury defendant Grover had verdict and judgment. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Stewart v. LansingSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Smith v. LivingstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Kellogg v. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
- Graham v. LarimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by24 opinions
- Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Eames v. CrosierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Berger v. SteinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Witty v. ClinchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.