Otis Elevator Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of S.F.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Percy E. Towne, T. C. Van Ness, Cushing & Cushing, Lloyd & Wood, and R H. Lloyd, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
The complaint in this action alleged that on January 20, 1904, plaintiff had on deposit in the bank of defendant a sum in excess of $6,496.50; that on said day plaintiff drew its checks against this deposit for two amounts, $5,496.50 and $1,000, respectively; that both of said checks on presentation were dishonored; that' .two days later the check of plaintiff for $75.55 was paid by the bank; and that when this last check was paid there was a balance due plain tiff from defendant of $6,496.50 on said account for which, amount plaintiff asked a judgment.
The defendant by answer admitted the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. . West Side BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Champion Ice Mfg. & Cold Storage Co. v. American Bonding & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Walsh v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- McCord v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Belknap v. National Bank of North AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Union Tool Co. v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Rutherford v. Rideout BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Glassell Development Co. v. Citizens' Natlional Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Basch v. Bank of Am. Nat'l Tr. & Sav. Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.