Legal Opinion

Spring Valley Water Works v. Barber

California Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1893No. 15015PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This action was brought to restrain the defendant, as tax collector of Alameda County, from making a sale for alleged delinquent taxes upon the assessment of a “franchise” for the fiscal year 1889-90. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and judgment rendered for defendant; and plaintiff appeals. No question as to proper remedy is raised, and the case is submitted upon the sole question of the legality of the assessment and tax.

As appears from the complaint, the plaintiff is a corporation *37organized under a general law approved. April 22, 1858, entitled “An act for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crocker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Stockton Gas & Elec. Co. v. San Joaquin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bank of California v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Western Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kern River Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API