Legal Opinion

Stockton Gas & Elec. Co. v. San Joaquin County

California Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1905No. Sac. Nos. 1065, 1070PublishedCited by 31 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

These are appeals in two cases which, as they involve the. same main legal proposition, will.he disposed of together. They are actions to recover taxes paid to the tax-collector of San Joaquin County by plaintiff under protest—one to recover such taxes paid in the year 1898, the other for taxes paid in the year 1899, upon the assessment of a franchise hereinafter to be mentioned. Plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of this state for many purposes, among others to manufacture, use, transmit, purchase, and sell gas for illuminating, heating, and other purposes; to produce,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. City of Chicago v. BaerIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Appeal of North Beach & Mission RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. San Francisco & San Mateo Electric Railway Co. v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Spring Valley Water Works v. BarberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State of California v. Marin Municipal Water Dist.California Supreme Court · 1941

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API