Bank of California v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. M. C. Sloss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff corporation to have an assessment of its franchise for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1901, declared illegal and void, and to recover from defendant $12,187.76, paid by it under protest, as taxes thereon.
Defendant had judgment in the court below, and plaintiff appeals therefrom on the judgment-roll.
The claim of the plaintiff is, that it has never owned or possessed any franchise whatever, and that the only franchise in any way connected with it is the corporate franchise, or the franchise of being a corporation, which, it is claimed, is the property of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Home Insurance v. New York StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Society for Savings v. CoiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Community Redevelopment Agency v. AbramsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Maxwell v. Kent-Coffey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Union Steam Pump Sales Co. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Crocker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Kaiser Land and Fruit Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.