Crocker v. Scott
California Supreme Court
The facts are" stated in the opinion of the court. Franklin K. Lane, City Attorney; Percy V. Long, City Attorney, W. F. Brobeck, Assistant City Attorney; William G. Burke, City Attorney, and A. S. Newburgh, Assistant City Attorney, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
Plaintiff, who is the owner of 5,096 shares of the capital stock of the Crocker-Woolworth National Bank, sought by this action to have it adjudged that the assessment and taxation of said shares for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1901, were illegal and void, and to obtain an injunction restraining defendant tax-collector from selling or declaring sold to the state, on account of said taxes, certain real property of plaintiff also assessed to her, and upon which said taxes on the shares of stock constituted a lien (Pol. Code, sec. 3717), or making any certificate of such sale, and for such…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hagood v. SouthernSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.