Kern River Co. v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, and Edward E. Bacon, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff sued, with partial success, to recover certain taxes for the fiscal year 1908-9, which had been paid under protest. This appeal is from that part of the judgment which was adverse to plaintiff.
Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the business of producing electricity for light and power. * From its power plant in Kern County it transmits its product over its lines to a transforming station in the city of Los Angeles, where all of its electricity is delivered to another corporation. No local service is given along the course of its transmission lines.
The tax which was paid under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- San Jose Gas Co. v. JanuaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Brenner v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Los Angeles v. Western Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Estate of RelphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Roehm v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Security-First National Bank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Cox Cable San Diego, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.