Legal Opinion
Lance v. United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 26, 2005No. Civil Action 04-746 (RCL)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs motion [9] for reconsideration of the Court’s January 21, 2005 order that granted defendants’ partial motion to dis miss. Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider the part of the decision that held that individual defendants cannot be liable under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (DCHRA). Upon consideration of the plaintiffs motion, the opposition thereto, the reply brief, the applicable law, and the record in this case, the Court will grant the plaintiffs motion for reconsideration.
BACKGROUND
A.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Anyanwutaku, K. v. Moore, MargaretCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & FlomDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Nancy H. Steorts v. American Airlines, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Piper v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Alston v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Purcell v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Mobley v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Zelaya v. UNICCO SERVICE COMPANYDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Mitchell v. National RR Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.