Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. National RR Passenger Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 30, 2005No. CIV.A. 01-1866(RWR)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Elayne Mitchell, formerly-employed by defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) in its human resources department, filed an amended complaint against Amtrak for race discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. (2000), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“ § 1981”)(Count I); age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621, et seq. (Count II); gender discrimination in violation of Title VII…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cruz-Packer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- INDIRA POOLA v. HOWARD UNIVERSITYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Smith v. Cafe AsiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Purcell v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- El Paso County, Texas v. Mary Lou Vasquez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.