Legal Opinion
Mobley v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 22, 2005No. CIV.A. 04-0287(JDB)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiff James Mobley seeks to recover benefits pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. On August 11, 2005, the Court denied defendant Continental Casualty Co.’s (“Continental”) motion for summary judgment. See Mobley v. Continental Casualty Co., 383 F.Supp.2d 80 (D.D.C.2005) (memorandum opinion) (hereinafter “Mobley Mem. Op.”). Presently before the Court is Continental’s motion for reconsideration of that opinion. For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny Continental’s motion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Holbrook, Dawnele v. Reno, JanetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Long v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Singh v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Sellmon v. ReillyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Pettaway v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Marcin v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.