Legal Opinion
Zelaya v. UNICCO SERVICE COMPANY
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 26, 2008No. Civil Action 07-02311 (RCL)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant UNICCO Service Company’s (“UNICCO”) “Motion to Dismiss Counts Two, Three and Five of Complaint” [4], defendants Argueta and Fernandes’s “Motion to Dismiss Complaint” [12], and defendant Alarcon’s “Motion to Dismiss Complaint” [16]. Upon full consideration of the motions, the oppositions and replies thereto, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court finds, for the reasons set forth below, that defendant UNICCO’s motion to dismiss will be DENIED in part and GRANTED in part,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ellis v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Brown v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hammel v. Marsh USA Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Cornish v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.