Legal Opinion

McCurdy v. State

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 28, 1992No. 9902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is the claimant estate’s1 appeal from the decision of the compensation review division of the workers’ compensation commission denying an award of specific benefits under the workers’ compensation law. General Statutes § 31-308 (b) (13).2

The claimant’s objections are subsumed under the general issue of whether it was entitled to a specific award of workers’ compensation benefits for permanent partial disability despite payment to the deceased *468of specific benefits for temporary total disability from-the time of his injuries until his death.3

The record discloses that on November 21,1983,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Enquist v. General DatacomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Bassett v. Stratford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCurdy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Cappellino v. Town of CheshireConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Cummings v. Twin Manufacturing, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Roswell v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. McCurdy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API