Cappellino v. Town of Cheshire
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLa very, J.
The sole issue in this case is whether a presumptive dependent is entitled to the full balance of specific benefits awarded to an employee who had reached maximum medical improvement and had collected some of the specific benefits when he became totally incapacitated and received temporary total benefits until his death from an unrelated cause.
The workers’ compensation commissioner found that the presumptive dependent was entitled to the full balance of the specific benefit. That decision was upheld by the compensation review division. The second injury and compensation assurance fund…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hansen v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Panico v. Sperry Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Franko v. William Schollhorn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Bassett v. Stratford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Morgan v. Town of East HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cappellino v. Town of CheshireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Cummings v. Twin Manufacturing, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Cappellino v. Town of CheshireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Arrico v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Esposito v. StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.