Enquist v. General Datacom
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
This is an appeal from a decision of the compensation review division of the workers’ compensation commission. The sole issue presented is whether an employer, who has properly intervened in an action by an injured employee against a third party, may set *21off future compensation claims against the net proceeds that the employee thereafter recovers from the third party tortfeasor. We conclude that such a set off is permitted and therefore reverse the decision of the Appellate Court.
Examination of the record discloses the following: On February 27,1979, the plaintiff crushed the thumb of his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mickel v. New England Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Stavola v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Rosenbaum v. Hartford News Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Uva v. AlonzySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Paternostro v. Edward Coon Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Vacco v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Weinberg v. ARA Vending Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Durniak v. August Winter & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Rydingsword v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.