Legal Opinion
Roswell v. State
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 10, 1992No. 10982PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff1 appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review division affirming *433the commissioner’s denial of additional specific benefits that she claims are due on behalf of her deceased husband, Frank Roswell. The issue is whether on the date of his death Roswell was entitled to an amended specific benefits award for an additional 50 percent permanent partial disability, payable to the plaintiff. We affirm the review division’s decision.
The record discloses that on July 16, 1984, Roswell, while employed by the state at the Southbury Training School, suffered a compensable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Osterlund v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Panico v. Sperry Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Schmidt v. O. K. Baking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Iacomacci v. Town of TrumbullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. General Dynamics Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Denning v. Denning, No. 10 19 18 (May 6, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Roswell v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992