Legal Opinion
Shidler v. Ross
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 20, 1941No. 29901PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in error and against plaintiff in error on a promissory note.
The note sued upon is dated Tulsa, Okla., August 16, 1937. By its terms it became due August 16, 1938. It was made payable to the order of Lucy Ross, F. C. Shidler, Effie Thompson, and Nina McKaig.
The original petition was in the name of the four persons named as payees of the note.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, filed a motion to require plaintiffs to make their petition more definite and certain in that they be required to set out their respective…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Ferguson and ZaringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- American Investment Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Citizens-First Nat. Bank v. WhitingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Miller v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co., Ltd. v. BiggersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Day & Whitt Furniture Co. v. Welbilt Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Mortgage Bond Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- City of Clinton, ex rel. Schuetter v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
- Stinchcomb v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Heffernon v. HigdonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.