Legal Opinion
City of Clinton, ex rel. Schuetter v. First Nat. Bank
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided July 18, 1941No. Civ. No. 66PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHT, District Judge.
This opinion applies in part, also, to cases Numbers 192, 244, 258, 373, 435, 442, 519; 535, 539, 563, 575, 578, 583, 589, 599, *913607, 608, 609, 614, 615, 617, 618, 620, 622, 627, 631, 632, 634, 642, 646, 694, and 695, now pending in this court. In all of these cases, suits have been filed in the name of the respective cities by and for the benefit of the bondholders owning paving bonds issued by the various cities named, for various street improvement or paving districts. The paving bonds were issued under the 1923 Act, Chap. 173, S.L.1923, 11 Okl.St.Ann. Chap. 3, §…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Smith v. SwormstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rombotis v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Signal Thread Company v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Enid ex rel. Versluis v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
- Town of Marshall ex rel. Versluis v. CareyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
- City of Hollis ex rel. Kearn v. CarrellDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.