Legal Opinion

Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Biggers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1918No. 6426PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; George O. Abernathy, Judge. Action by the Liverpool & London & Globe insurance Company, Limited, against Richard F. Biggers and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, C. J.

On November 16, 1911, Richard F. Biggers (doing business under the name of B. F. Biggers & Co.) was appointed an agent of the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company, Limited, at Shawnee, OMa. On the same day Biggers ejxecuted to the insurance company an agency bond which was signed by the defendants Aaron H. Bikenbury.. George M. 1). Steel, and William H. Lokey. The bond contained various covenants and provisions, the pertinent ones being as follows:

“It is further hereby stipulated and made a further condition of this bond that if for any reason thej said B. F. Biggers & Co. ceases to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Early v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Leach v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Lawson v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Kansas City Bridge Co. v. Lindsay Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haas v. Commissioners of Lincoln ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Shidler v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. State Bank of Grove v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API