Legal Opinion

Stinchcomb v. Harris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 1943No. 30578PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted on June 5, 1940, by the defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover advancements and commissions alleged to be due under a contract between broker and customer.

In their petition plaintiffs alleged, in substance, that they were general partners conducting a brokerage business and engaged in buying and selling stocks, bonds, grain, and commodities on the securities and commodities exchanges for the accounts of their customers, and that defendant had been a customer of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bleecker v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Maine v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Meads, Seaman & Co. v. LasarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Choctaw Lumber Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  5. Patterson Furniture Co. v. ByersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mayor v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Rutter v. HeatlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Phelps v. MaloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Jones v. Nicoma Park Radio & Television ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. George Thatcher Corporation v. BullenUtah Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API