Miller v. Oil Well Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Custer County; T. r. Clay, Judge. Action by the Oil Well Supply Company against John E. Miller and others on contract of guaranty. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant named brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Custer county to recover of the Custer Petroleum Company, as principal, and H. J. Rice and John E. Miller, as guarantors, the sum of $2,899.41, the purchase price of certain goods, wares, and merchandise furnished the Custer Petroleum Company by dtfendant in error.
Tlie liability of plaintiff in error, John E. Miller, who is the only party appealing to this court, arises by reason of and under the terms and conditions of a certain guaranty agreement which is as follows :
“Oil Well Supply Company,
“Pittsburgh, Pa.
“Gentlemen:
“In consideration of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- T. & H. Smith & Co. v. ThesmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Oklahoma City Nat. Bank v. EzzardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Hancock & GoodbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Midwest Engineering & Construction Co. v. Electric Regulator Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Shidler v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Abbott v. National Bank of Commerce of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Tibbets & Pleasant v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.