Legal Opinion

Breckenridge v. Drummond

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1916No. 6445PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Pittsburg County; W. C. Leidke, Judge. Action by R. Lee Drummond against A. W. Breckenridge. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This action Avas commenced to recover damages charged to have been sustained by R. Lee Drummond by reason of an assault and battery committed on his person by A. W. Breckenridge, the plaintiff in error. There was a trial to the court and a jury, and a judgment returned for plaintiff for $450. From that judgment an appeal has been prosecuted to this, court.

Two errors only are argued in the brief of the plaintiff in error: First, in the admission of testimony on behalf of the defendant in error, the plaintiff in the trial court, over the objection of the defendant, as to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. WelchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Corder v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Spain v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oller v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Phillips v. MooneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Mitchell v. FaheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. J. C. Penney Co. v. GravelleNevada Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API