Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Fahey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1925No. 15351PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties appear in tbe same order as in tbe trial court. Plaintiff sued defendant for rent of a room in his building in which defendant carried on a baby shop or stork nest, aiding bis suit by attachment, on the grounds, first, that defendant had left the county of her residence to avoid service of summons; and second, that she so concealed herself that summons could not be served. In the justice court, judgment was for defendant on the debt and also dissolving the attachment. On appeal to the district court, judgment for the debt was for the plaintiff, but for defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. WelchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Breckenridge v. DrummondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Reister v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baker v. First Nat. Bank of Santa RosaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API