Legal Opinion

Corder v. Purcell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1915No. 4878PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Pawnee County; L. M. Poe, Judae. Action by Mary Purcell against Henry Corder and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This action was com’menced in the trial court by Mary Purcell against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants, to quiet title to 80 acres, of land in Pawnee county, Okla. The petition contained, the usual allegations in such actions. The answer, in addition to a general denial, alleged that the land in dispute belonged to one Eliza Craft, who died seised thereof, intestate, and without issue, on the 26th day of November, 1908; that she was not survived by a husband, father, or mother, but was survived by these defendants, as next of kin; that they were brothers and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Purcell v. CorderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. King v. GantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Clover v. NeelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Fox v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Columbus Club v. SimonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Cleveland v. MaschoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API