Oller v. Hicks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
Plaintiff in error, defendant in the trial court, has appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for defendant in error, plaintiff below, in an action brought to recover damages for assault.
Plaintiff, a 55 year old bulldozer operator, had some physical impairment of the right hand, and was required to wear glasses for all activities. Defendant, a land and cattle dealer, was 59 years of age and slightly larger than plaintiff. The parties were brothers-in-law, but had not spoken for several years. The relevant facts, as determined by the jury from extensive, highly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prentis v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Harrod v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Horany v. ParisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Margay Oil Corp. v. JamisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Main v. LevineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Wayne Kitchens v. Bryan County National BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Cox v. StolworthyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.