Legal Opinion

Oller v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 28, 1967No. 41504PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

Plaintiff in error, defendant in the trial court, has appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for defendant in error, plaintiff below, in an action brought to recover damages for assault.

Plaintiff, a 55 year old bulldozer operator, had some physical impairment of the right hand, and was required to wear glasses for all activities. Defendant, a land and cattle dealer, was 59 years of age and slightly larger than plaintiff. The parties were brothers-in-law, but had not spoken for several years. The relevant facts, as determined by the jury from extensive, highly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Prentis v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Harrod v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Horany v. ParisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Margay Oil Corp. v. JamisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Main v. LevineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Dayton Hudson Corp. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Wayne Kitchens v. Bryan County National BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Cox v. StolworthyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API