Legal Opinion

Bumgarner Ex Rel. Bumgarner v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1957No. 524PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

In considering the appeal of the Southern Railway Company we may dismiss as without significance the allegation that neither warning signs nor signals were placed at the crossing where the accident occurred. The driver of the automobile knew the crossing and stopped for it. Therefore, he had all the notice warning devices could have given him. Evidence is lacking to support the plaintiff’s allegation that the speed of the train was in violation of law — either State statute or city ordinance, or that after seeing the car on the track the train crew could have stopped the train in time to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Coleman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Norris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Parker v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Irby v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Partin v. Carolina Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Britt v. MangumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. High v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Small v. MallorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Britt v. MangumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API