Partin v. Carolina Power and Light Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The defendant’s motion for directed verdict under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50, raises the question of whether plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to go to the jury. The appeal from the granting of de fendant’s motion by the trial court presents for determination the issue of whether plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient on the issue of defendant’s negligence, and, if so, whether plaintiff’s evidence established his contributory negligence as a matter of law.
I. NEGLIGENCE OF DEFENDANT
It has been established as a general principle of law that one who maintains a high voltage electric line at…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Haynes v. Kaleigh Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Bowen v. CONSTRUCTORS EQUIPMENT RENTAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Lewis v. BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Mason v. Arizona Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Petty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
- Westbrook v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Smock v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.