Legal Opinion

High v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1958No. 598PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The sole question of law presented by this appeal is whether the evidence, taken in its entirety, was sufficient to survive the defendant’s motion for nonsuit entered at the close of all the evidence. Ward v. Smith, 223 N.C. 141, 25 S.E. 2d 463; White v. Lacey, 245 N.C. 364, 96 S.E. 2d 1; Murray v. Wyatt, 245 N.C. 123, 95 S.E. 2d 541.

Whether the evidence is sufficient to require its submission to the jury is a question of law. The court does not pass upon the credibility of the witnesses or the weight of their testimony. “It takes it for granted that the evidence favorable to the plaintiff is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Ward v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Parker v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Marshburn v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Murray v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Brown v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. McFalls v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Price v. State Capital Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Walker Ex Rel. Walker v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API