Legal Opinion

Small v. Mallory

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1959No. 612PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.

The sole question presented for decision on this appeal challenges the correctness of the ruling of the trial court in overruling defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. In connection therewith it is appropriate to say that the “family purpose doctrine” with respect to automobiles has been adopted as the law in this jurisdiction, and applied in numerous cases— among which are these: Robertson v. Aldridge, 185 N.C. 292, 116 S.E. 742; Allen v. Garibaldi, 187 N.C. 798, 123 S.E. 66; Watts v. Lefler, 190 N.C. 722, 130 S.E. 630; Grier v. Woodside, 200…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Robertson ex rel. King v. AldridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Matthews v. . CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Allen v. . GaribaldiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Ewing v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Small v. MallorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API