Legal Opinion

Irby v. Southern Railway Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1957No. 240PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.

If it be conceded that the evidence shown in the case on appeal is sufficient to support a finding by the jury that defendants were negligent at least in operating the train at a speed in excess of the city ordinance, the evidence offered by plaintiff, as shown in the case on appeal, establishes as a matter of law that plaintiff, by his own negligence, as a proximate cause, contributed to his injury. Godwin v. R. R., 220 N.C. 281, 17 S.E. 2d 137; McCrimmon v. Powell, 221 N.C. 216, 19 S.E. 2d 880; Bailey v. R. R., 223 N.C. 244, 25 S.E. 2d 833; Parker v. R. R., 232 N.C. 472, 61 S.E. 2d 370;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Bailey v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Parker v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Price v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. O'Boyle Tank Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Arvin v. McClintockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API