Tognazzini v. Freeman
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
This action is for damages alleged to have occurred as the result of a collision between two automobiles, one driven by the plaintiff and the other by the defendants. The cause of action pleaded in the plaintiff’s complaint was based primarily upon, the claim that the defendants intentionally and willfully ran their automobile upon and against the automobile of plaintiff. On the other hand, the defendants in their answer, after specifically denying all the allegations of the complaint save and except the happening of the collision, pleaded that the injuries, if any, sustained by the plaintiff…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Holwerson v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Esrey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Donnelly v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Kastel v. StieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Falls v. MortensenOregon Supreme Court · 1956
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.