Legal Opinion

Falls v. Mortensen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1956PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

The plaintiff, a pedestrian, recovered a verdict and judgment for general, special and punitive damages separately assessed against the driver of an automobile which struck him down while he was crossing the street at a point other than an intersection. Defendant appeals.

The principal issues in the case relate to the pleadings, proof and instructions concerning alleged wanton misconduct of defendant and the effect thereof on the defense of contributory negligence.

In a second amended complaint as further amended on the day of trial, plaintiff alleged, in substance, the following: That…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. Interstate Transit Lines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Cowgill, Adm'r v. Boock, Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Kasanovich v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Bordonaro v. SenkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Gombos v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Winn v. GilroyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Chaffin v. ChaffinOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Bertram v. HarrisAlaska Supreme Court · 1967

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API