In Re the Welfare of V.D.M.

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

Appellant V.D.M. challenges the juvenile court’s revocation of her extended jurisdiction juvenile status contending the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction over her because she became 21 prior to the court’s order.

FACTS

The facts of this case are undisputed. On August 15, 1996, appellant entered an admission to a charge of intentional murder in the second degree. On September 3, 1996, appellant was adjudicated delinquent and designated an extended jurisdiction juvenile (EJJ). She received a stayed adult prison sentence of 306 months conditioned upon her…