Caspary v. Moore
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—An appeal from a judgment recovered as damages for a breach of a written contract. The judgment was ■ entered against Merle Norman, who has appealed, and in favor of Augusta Gasp ary. The questions presented are whether appellant and respondent were parties to the contract, or the evidence supports the award.
Appellant was engaged, under the name of Merle Norman Co., in the manufacture and sale of cosmetics, which were sold in connection with a method of facial treatments devised by her and known as the Merle Norman Cosmetic Treatments. On November 28, 1933, she made a written…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Hacker Pipe & Supply Co. v. Chapman Valve Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Greenwood v. MooradianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.