Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Honican

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 25, 1988No. ACMR 8701445PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GILLEY, Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial found appellant, pursuant to his pleas, guilty of five specifications of forgery in violation of Article 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 923 (1982).1 The military judge sentenced him to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for three years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to the grade of Private E-l. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement the convening authority approved the sentence, but suspended for 180 days those parts of the confinement and the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. EdmondU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. AlexanderU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. GarnerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. VoganU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. ArnoldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API