United States v. Alexander
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
KASTL, Senior Judge:
Insisting that it is fundamental military practice that all existing charges be tried together, Sergeant Alexander argues that the convening authority erred by failing to refer the Charge and specification in the instant case to the appellant’s earlier court-martial. We disagree and affirm.
Summary of Proceedings
After the appellant and his wife were injured on a commercial airline flight to Nashville, Tennessee, both received civilian medical treatment. The air carrier paid the hospital bills of each by separate check. The Government asserts that the appellant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. TraversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. GambleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. HoltU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. RascoeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. BookerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
- United States v. FaheyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991